This page reviews CrushOn.AI, an adult AI chat platform. Explicit adult content. You must be 18+ to enter.
ExitThe lowest credible entry price in the category, the only mid-conversation model switching we found, and a full mobile-game earn economy bolted on. Also the worst privacy findings of any product here that has not had an actual breach.
Visit CrushOn.AICrushOn is the cheap-entry play, and it earns that description honestly — browse without an account, signup forced at the first message, email only, no card, and a paid tier starting at $5.99. Verified What makes it more interesting than a discount clone is the retention machinery: this is the richest earn-and-return loop in the entire market, closer to a mobile game than to a chat app.
The reason we moved its score down is not the product. It is everything around the product. Mozilla’s Privacy Not Included audit found 45 trackers firing within one minute on the site, “health data” mentioned 23 times in the privacy policy, and conversations reportedly stored unencrypted. Verified Add an unannounced server-side model swap in April 2026 that wiped context for paying users, and a support reputation that dominates its one-star reviews, and you have a product that is pleasant to use and risky to trust.
Cheap unfiltered roleplay, and switching models mid-scene when one starts writing badly.
You care about data handling, or you are going to be upset when support does not answer.
Revised down this pass, for three specific reasons: an independent privacy audit found 45 trackers firing within one minute and conversations reportedly stored unencrypted; an unannounced April 2026 model change made paying subscribers’ companions forget everything; and ignored support tickets are the single most-cited complaint in its user reviews. The product is still good. The operation around it is the problem.
Category pages score each app against that category’s own criterion — a “Chat Score” and an “Image Score” measure different things. The number above is the overall score.
Browse without an account; signup is forced at the first message. Email only, no real name, one to four minutes, no card. Verified
The age gate is a self-declaration checkbox. No biometric, no ID — a stark contrast with SpicyChat since late 2025, and repeatedly flagged as trivially bypassable in safety write-ups. Verified Whether that is a feature or a liability depends on which regulator is looking.
NSFW is off by default, behind an “Unfiltered” switch with a confirmation dialog, flippable per session. Verified Browse is popularity-first, with full profile cards you can read before you start. One reviewer’s aside is worth carrying: popularity and quality do not always line up.
No App Store presence. Web, plus a manually sideloaded Android APK. Verified
Replies land in a few seconds. Mid-conversation model switching is the signature differentiator — you can swap the model inside the same chat, across 17+ options reportedly including Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o mini and DeepSeek variants. We did not find another platform in this category offering that at this price. Verified
The deficit is editing. Regenerate exists but only for the last message, and you choose between two options. There is no message edit, no delete, and no regenerating older messages — a real step down from SpicyChat or Kindroid. Worse, on the free tier a regenerate reportedly costs two messages from your allowance. Regret is metered. Reported
Scene Cards let you bind custom 19:9 background images per character. Image Replies have characters answer with mood-consistent images. Group chat exists. Voice is reply-only TTS with 30+ voices, no voice input, unlocking at the Standard tier. Verified
The stated figures: 8K context free, 16K paid; free conversations deleted after seven days of inactivity; roughly 200 messages of history per character kept on the free tier. Tools include pinning (“manual memory anchors”) and auto-summarisation. Reported
The reality check is uncomfortable, because the company’s own April 2025 press release headline was “Unfiltered NSFW AI with Longest Memory.” One hands-on review reports memory collapsing quickly — two out of three test conversations caved in before message 20. Contested Sources conflict with the marketing here, and we are flagging that rather than resolving it.
Note also that the seven-day expiry on free conversations is loss-aversion pointed at your own emotional investment. That is a retention mechanic, not a storage constraint.
CrushOn runs a full mobile-game earn economy, and nothing else in this category comes close: Verified
Daily check-in worth 50 coins. Daily tasks (send N messages, create a character). 50 coins for your first character. Referral bonuses, social-follow rewards, occasional surveys. And redemption codes tweeted by the official account that expire fast — scarcity-driven re-engagement through an owned channel, which has spawned an entire third-party ecosystem of sites republishing those codes. That is free acquisition traffic generated by a retention mechanic, which is genuinely clever.
There is also “Target Play” — set shared goals with the AI and track interaction progress, effectively a gamified relationship meter. Reported A 70k+ Discord sits underneath all of it.
One caveat we will not paper over: a 2026 review claims no daily bonus exists any more, so parts of the earn system may have been trimmed. The code ecosystem is still actively covered in 2026. Contested
Mozilla’s Privacy Not Included project found 45 trackers firing within one minute on the site, “health data” referenced 23 times in the privacy policy, and conversations reportedly stored unencrypted. Verified This is not a rumour from a review blog; it is a named research project with a published methodology.
Nothing here says CrushOn has leaked anything. It says the surface area is large and the handling is loose, in a category where the Muah.AI breach already demonstrated what happens when intimate prompts tied to real email addresses get out. Use a dedicated email. Do not put identifying details in chat.
| Tier | Price | What it buys |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | ~50 msgs/day (2026), 8K context, 7-day conversation expiry, free models, ads between sessions |
| Standard | $5.99/mo | ~2,000 msgs/mo, voice, “Pro” models, ~50 images/mo (annual reportedly ~$4.19–4.90/mo) |
| Premium | $14.99/mo | 6,000 “ultra-speed” messages, image generation, 16K context, ~200 HD images |
| Deluxe / Lux / Elite | $39.99–$49.99/mo | Unlimited messages, maximum memory, 100 characters, all models |
Tiers here are genuinely unstable across time and across sources — one source cites a tier reaching $199.99/mo. Treat this table as a shape, not a quote. Free-tier history is its own lesson: roughly 100 credits per month refilling on your account anniversary rather than the 1st, changed around April 2026 to roughly 50 messages/day — simultaneously more generous and far more habit-forming.
Across this category, editorial ratings and user ratings are close to inversely correlated. We publish both, because the gap is usually the most useful number on the page.
The review count is small enough that the exact number should not be over-read, but the direction and the themes are consistent across every source we checked. Trustpilot blocks direct fetching from our environment, so this arrives second-hand through sites quoting it. Reported The dominant one-star themes are support and billing, not content quality.
Products in this category change under their users constantly. These are the events worth knowing about before you commit a character — or a year’s subscription — to one.
Pro subscribers reported their companions “forgot everything,” traced to an unannounced server-side model update. Users circulated workarounds — re-injecting context every 10–12 messages. Analysis of the Feb–May 2026 complaint window shows the centre of gravity moving from message limits to memory and character consistency.
45 trackers firing within one minute; “health data” mentioned 23 times in the privacy policy; conversations reportedly stored unencrypted. Published by Mozilla’s Privacy Not Included project.
A gallery feature reportedly sat in closed beta for roughly a year while paying users could not access it. Cited as a trust-eroding pattern, and a good argument for labelling unfinished features honestly rather than implying they are purchasable.
Use a dedicated email and do not put identifying details in chat. Mozilla’s Privacy Not Included audit found 45 trackers firing within a minute on the site, “health data” mentioned 23 times in the privacy policy, and conversations reportedly stored unencrypted. There has been no reported breach — but the handling is loose in a category that has already had a serious one.
The entry tier is around $5.99/mo, which is the lowest credible paid price in the category, with Premium around $14.99 and higher tiers running $39.99–$49.99. Be aware the tier structure is genuinely unstable — sources from the same year disagree, and one cites a tier as high as $199.99/mo. Check the live pricing page before you buy.
Yes — roughly 50 messages a day as of 2026, with 8K context and ads between sessions. Two catches: free conversations are deleted after seven days of inactivity, and a regenerate reportedly costs two messages from your allowance.
Yes, and this is its best feature. You can swap between 17+ models inside the same chat, reportedly including Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o mini and DeepSeek variants. No other platform in this category offers that at this price point.
Most likely an unannounced server-side model change — that is what caused the widely-reported April 2026 incident where paying subscribers’ companions lost their context. It can also be the free tier’s seven-day inactivity deletion. Pinning key facts as manual memory anchors is the standard user workaround.
Compiled from vendor documentation and independent review sources during a read-only research pass in July 2026 — not from a paid subscription run on every product. Every claim below carries the confidence marker it arrived with, and anything we could not confirm was left out rather than asserted. Full method.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through a link on this page. That has no effect on the score, and the score above was set before any affiliate relationship was considered. We do not own or operate CrushOn.AI; for the four sites in this market that we do own, see our ownership disclosure.
https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/privacynotincluded/crushon-ai/
https://www.roborhythms.com/crushon-ai-memory-not-working/
https://www.roborhythms.com/is-crushon-ai-free-worth-it/
https://dreamgen.com/blog/articles/crushon-ai-review
https://honeychat.bot/en/blog/crushon-ai-review-2026/